Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
apps:biomet_utci [2015/04/01 00:02] enviadminapps:biomet_utci [2015/04/01 00:04] enviadmin
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 ==== Final Remarks ==== ==== Final Remarks ====
-We do not recommend to use UTCI in the regression-based version for using 2m (1.6m) level wind speeds. In a complex urban environment, wind speeds at pedestrian level are unique and cannot be related to some above-roof general quantity.  Instead, we propose the application of a pure phxsically-based approach such as PET. PET is a much more open platform and the final outcomes are more or less the same for all static indicators. +We do not recommend to use UTCI in the regression-based version based on using 2m (1.6m) level wind speeds extrapolated to 10m. In a complex urban environment, wind speeds at pedestrian level are unique and cannot be related to some above-roof general quantity.  Instead, we propose the application of a pure phxsically-based approach such as PET. PET is a much more open platform and the final outcomes are more or less the same for all static indicators.