A holistic microclimate model

You are here: Technical Model Webpage » ENVI-met Applications Homepage » UTCI

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
apps:biomet_utci [2015/04/01 00:01] – enviadminapps:biomet_utci [2015/04/01 00:04] – enviadmin
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 ==== Final Remarks ==== ==== Final Remarks ====
-We do not recommend to use UTCI in the regression-based version for using 2m (1.6m) level wind speeds. In a complex urban environment, wind speeds at pedestrian level are unique and cannot be related to some above-roof general quantity.   PET is a much more open platform and the final outcomes are more or less the same for all static indicators. +We do not recommend to use UTCI in the regression-based version based on using 2m (1.6m) level wind speeds extrapolated to 10m. In a complex urban environment, wind speeds at pedestrian level are unique and cannot be related to some above-roof general quantity.  Instead, we propose the application of a pure phxsically-based approach such as PET. PET is a much more open platform and the final outcomes are more or less the same for all static indicators.